Skip to main content

Table 2 Inverse PINN comparison between calibrated roughness values from GLUE experiments and the ones obtained from different AFs and different flow values

From: Physics-Informed Neural Network water surface predictability for 1D steady-state open channel cases with different flow types and complex bed profile shapes

Flow (m3 s−1)

n GLUE [19]

Activation function

n

Hidden layers

Neurons per hidden layer

Loss function

0.035

0.555–0.609

Tanh

0.444

3

60

0.024

ReLU

0.245

9

60

21.275

Sin

0.445

5

60

0.020

Sigmoid

0.459

5

60

0.019

0.443

0.105–0.124

Tanh

0.107

7

60

0.025

ReLU

0.135

7

60

27.487

Sin

0.130

5

40

0.067

Sigmoid

0.148

7

60

0.019

0.878

0.092–0.121

Tanh

0.135

3

60

0.024

ReLU

0.122

9

60

28.317

Sin

0.129

5

40

0.044

Sigmoid

0.127

9

60

0.018