Skip to main content

Table 1 Final estimated Windkessel parameters

From: A flexible framework for sequential estimation of model parameters in computational hemodynamics

Outlet

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C (\(\hbox {mm}^3\)/Pa)

 True values

0.783

0.409

0.324

0.464

0.464

0.660

0.761

0.293

0.296

 A (no P)

0.844

0.432

0.358

0.500

0.480

0.693

0.775

0.302

0.308

 % error

7.83%

5.64%

10.31%

7.78%

3.38%

4.96%

1.84%

2.98%

4.16%

 B (1 P)

0.843

0.431

0.354

0.498

0.475

0.690

0.765

0.302

0.308

 % error

7.73%

5.38%

9.26%

7.23%

2.44%

4.54%

0.50%

2.91%

4.13%

 C (all P)

0.829

0.425

0.340

0.480

0.463

0.679

0.739

0.302

0.308

 % error

5.88%

3.76%

4.73%

3.40%

0.12%

2.97%

2.87%

2.85%

4.02%

\(R_2\) (Pa s/\(\hbox {mm}^3\))

 True values

0.629

1.202

1.517

1.060

1.061

0.746

0.647

1.679

1.664

 A (no P)

0.598

1.157

1.444

1.018

1.034

0.714

0.629

1.652

1.627

 % error

− textbf4.93%

− 3.76%

− 4.83%

− 3.94%

− 2.55%

− 4.29%

− 2.78%

1.57%

2.22%

 B (1 P)

0.615

1.194

1.507

1.055

1.073

0.736

0.650

1.706

1.680

 % error

− 2.17%

− 0.65%

− 0.70%

− 0.47%

1.18%

− 1.34%

0.47%

1.61%

0.97%

 C (all P)

0.625

1.219

1.539

1.079

1.096

0.748

0.659

1.733

1.708

 % error

− 0.59%

1.38%

1.46%

1.77%

3.31%

0.29%

1.83%

3.27%

2.67%

\(R_1\) (Pa s/\(\hbox {mm}^3\))

 True values

0.137

0.137

0.269

0.279

0.279

0.147

0.246

0.107

0.122

 A (no P)

0.137

0.144

0.306

0.290

0.288

0.147

0.253

0.114

0.128

 % error

0.32%

5.21%

14.05%

3.89%

3.28%

0.05%

2.62%

6.25%

4.71%

 B (1 P)

0.137

0.144

0.306

0.290

0.288

0.148

0.252

0.114

0.127

 % error

0.04%

4.67%

14.00%

3.83%

3.28%

0.40%

2.43%

5.90%

4.42%

 C (all P)

0.135

0.141

0.302

0.287

0.286

0.148

0.248

0.111

0.125

 % error

− 1.27%

2.77%

12.31%

2.59%

2.56%

0.68%

0.83%

3.69%

2.56%

  1. Case A has no pressure data, Case B has pressure data only in the left carotid artery, and Case C has pressure data at all nine outlets of the model (c.f. Fig. 8). See Fig. 9 for the parameter evolution in each case. Errors less than 5% in absolute value are highlighted in bold; those less than 2.5% are shown in italic