Skip to main content

Table 1 Observed convergence rates in Figures 3 , 4 , 6 and 7 for uniform and adaptive mesh refining

From: A posteriori error analysis of stabilised FEM for degenerate convex minimisation problems under weak regularity assumptions

Example of subsection

 

σ- σ L p ( Ω ) 2

u- u L 2 ( Ω ) 2

η R

η F

η L

D(u- u ) L 2 ( Ω ) 2

η H

  

unstab.

stab.

unstab.

stab.

unstab.

stab.

stab.

unstab.

stab.

stab.

 

unif

5/3

5/3

3/2

7/5

4/5

4/5

1

3/5

1/2

1/3

‘Two-well benchmark’

R-adapt

2

7/5

(5/3)

6/5

1

1

1

(2/3)

2/5

2/5

 

F-adapt

2

4/3

(5/3)

6/5

1

1

1

(2/3)

2/5

2/5

 

unif

5/3

5/3

3/2

7/5

4/5

4/5

1

3/5

1/2

1/3

‘Modified two-well benchmark’

R-adapt

2

7/5

(5/3)

6/5

1

1

1

(2/3)

2/5

2/5

 

F-adapt

11/5

4/3

(7/4)

6/5

1

1

1

(2/3)

2/5

2/5

 

unif

(1)

3/2

7/5

1

4/5

1

1/2

2/5

‘Three-well benchmark’

R-adapt

2

(1/4)

(1/4)

1

(1/3)

(1)

(1/5)

 

F-adapt

9/5

1

4/5

1

3/5

4/5

1/3

1/3

 

unif

    

4/5

4/5

6/5

  

2/5

‘An optimal design example’

R-adapt

    

1

4/5

6/5

  

2/5

 

F-adapt

    

1

4/5

1

  

2/5

  1. Convergence rates are given as powers of the representative mesh-size 1 / ndof which is proportional to H on uniform grids. Unavailable values are left blank, non-continuous rates are put in parantheses, inconclusive convergence behaviour is marked by “—”.